Trading volume
Trades involving the accounts
Across these four groups, 50 accounts received payments from two distributors linked by transfers to Polymarket’s international exchange fee wallet.
| Group | Payments received | Net trading fees | Payments ÷ fees |
|---|---|---|---|
| 815,877.93 | 207,775.20paid | 3.93× | |
| 142,040.71 | 6,220.57net rebates received | Payments + rebates | |
| 47,246.25 | 1,035.56net rebates received | Payments + rebates | |
| 16,532.69 | 4,442.23paid | 3.72× |
Payments are separate credits into trading accounts. Net fees are trading charges minus execution rebates. The two groups marked “net rebates received” were credited more in rebates than they paid in charges. These figures exclude trading gains, losses and funding costs.
Click each step for the wallets and transactions. The transfers pass through pooled balances; this links the payout network to fee infrastructure, without assigning every payment to a particular fee deposit.
The groups come from money transfers and capital movements. Here is the connection behind each one.
Shared funding routes, recycled withdrawals and cash-out links join several branches into one financial network.
One route: 8bff → d04a → 059e. A 500,000-USDC treasury deposit precedes 190,100 pUSD recycled into the next account.
48 verified direct USDC transfers connect the wallets. Eight members held large, mostly offsetting positions.
On July 2, member cbdc sent 365,000 USDC each to four other members: 1.46m USDC in total.
Member 8281 directly funded all ten accounts. The group also moved cash between members.
On September 15, they withdrew, pooled and redistributed 2,185.21 pUSD in 144 seconds.
Connected funding wallets supplied the pair. Their trading portfolios took opposite positions.
All 50 executions were against each other: $9.00m of trading in the month.
The four groups are kept separate. Transfers establish the links within them; shared payout infrastructure and trading with another group do not establish one owner across all four.